Reading
Cases
• Dickson v United Kingdom (2008) 46 EHRR 41
• Evans v United Kingdom (2008) 46 EHRR 34
• Paton v United Kingdom (1981) 3 EHRR 408
• H v Norway (1992) ECHR
Book chapters and Journal articles
• Rosemary Hunter, Clare McGlynn and Erika Rackley (eds), Feminist Judgments: From Theory to Practice (Hart Publishing, 2010), ch 4
• Nicolette Priaulx, ‘Rethinking progenitive conflict: why reproductive autonomy matters’ (2008) 16 Med L Rev 169
• Mary Ford, ‘Evans v United Kingdom: what implications for the jurisprudence of pregnancy’ (2008) 8 HRL Rev 171
• Rosy Thornton, ‘European Court of Human Rights: consent to IVF treatment’ (2008) 6 IJCL 317
• Marleen Eijkholt, ‘The right to procreate is not aborted’ (2008) 16 Med L Rev 284
• N.A. Moreham, ‘The right to respect for private life in the European Convention on Human Rights: a re-examination’ (2008) 1 EHRL Rev 44
• Case Comment, ‘Prisoners’ rights: prisoner and wife seeking artificial insemination – right to found a family’ (2008) 2 EHRL Rev 282
• Case Comment, ‘In vitro fertilisation – consent of both parties – withdrawal of consent’ (2007) 4 EHRL Rev 457
• Lorenzo Zucca, ‘Evans v United Kingdom: frozen embryos and conflicting rights’ (2007) 11 Edin L Rev 446
The topics relate to Human Rights and the essay titles are outlined in each relevant tutorial and noted below. This unit of assessment requires a critical analysis of the mentioned area of Human Rights law, thus developing your critical thinking and analysis skills.