Organization Change and Development

Spooked by Computers

The New England Arts Project had its headquarters above an Italian restaurant in Portsmouth, New Hampshire. The project had five full-time employees, and during busy times of the year, particularly the month before Christmas, it hired as many as six part-time workers to type, address envelopes, and send out mailings. Although each of the five full-timers had a title and a formal job description, an observer would have had trouble telling their positions apart. Suzanne Clammer, for instance, was the executive director, the head of the office, but she could be found typing or licking envelopes just as often as Martin Welk, who had been working for less than a year as office coordinator, the lowest position in the project’s hierarchy.
Despite a constant sense of being a month behind, the office ran relatively smoothly. No outsider would have had a prayer of finding a mailing list or a budget in the office, but project employees knew where almost everything was, and after a quiet fall they did not mind having their small space packed with workers in November. But a number of the federal funding agencies on which the project relied began to grumble about the cost of the part-time workers, the amount of time the project spent handling routine paperwork, and the chaotic condition of its financial records. The pressure to make a radical change was on. Finally Martin Welk said it: “Maybe we should get a computer.”
To Welk, fresh out of college, where he had written his papers on a word processor, computers were just another tool to make a job easier. But his belief was not shared by the others in the office, the youngest of whom had fifteen years more seniority than he. A computer would eat the project’s mailing list, they said, destroying any chance of raising funds for the year. It would send the wrong things to the wrong people, insulting them and convincing them that the project had become another faceless organization that did not care. They swapped horror stories about computers that had charged them thousands of dollars for purchases they had never made or had assigned the same airplane seat to five people.
“We’ll lose all control,” Suzanne Clammer complained. She saw some kind of office automation as inevitable, yet she kept thinking she would probably quit before it came about. She liked hand-addressing mailings to arts patrons whom she had met, and she felt sure that the recipients contributed more because they recognized her neat blue printing. She remembered the agonies of typing class in high school and believed she was too old to take on something new and bound to be much more confusing. Two other employees, with whom she had worked for a decade, called her after work to ask if the prospect of a computer in the office meant they should be looking for other jobs. “I have enough trouble with English grammar,” one of them wailed. “I’ll never be able to learn computer language.”
One morning Clammer called Martin Welk into her office, shut the door, and asked him if he could recommend any computer consultants. She had read an article that explained how a company could waste thousands of dollars by adopting integrated office automation in the wrong way, and she figured the project would have to hire somebody for at least six months to get the new machines working and to teach the staff how to use them. Welk was pleased because Clammer evidently had accepted the idea of a computer in the office. But he also realized that as the resident authority on computers, he had a lot of work to do before they went shopping for machines.
Case Questions

a. Is organization development appropriate in this situation? Why or why not?

b. What kinds of resistance to change have the employees of the project displayed?

c. What can Martin Welk do to overcome the resistance?

Found something interesting ?

• On-time delivery guarantee
• PhD-level professional writers
• Free Plagiarism Report

• 100% money-back guarantee
• Absolute Privacy & Confidentiality
• High Quality custom-written papers

Related Model Questions

Feel free to peruse our college and university model questions. If any our our assignment tasks interests you, click to place your order. Every paper is written by our professional essay writers from scratch to avoid plagiarism. We guarantee highest quality of work besides delivering your paper on time.

Neural Net Evolution. A neural net typically starts out with random weights; hence it produces essentially random predictions in the first iteration. Describe how the neural net evolves (in JMP) to produce a more accurate prediction? Car Sales. Consider again the data on used cars ( ) with 1436 records and details on 38 attributes, including Price, Age, KM, HP, and other specifications. The goal is to predict the price of a used Toyota Corolla based on its specifications. a. Determine which variables to include, and use the neural platform in JMP Pro to fit a model. Use the validation column for validation, and use the default values in the Neural model launch dialog. Record the RMSE for the training data and the validation data, and save the formula for the model to the data table (use the Save Fast Formulas option, which will save the formula as one column in the data table). Repeat the process, changing the number of nodes (and ouly this) to 5, 10, and 25. i. Using your recorded values, what happens to the RMSE for the training data as the number of nodes increases? ii. What happens to the RMSE for the validation data? iii. Comment on the appropriate number of nodes for the model. iv. Use the Model Comparison platform to compare these four models (use the Validation column as either aByvariable or as a Group variable, and focus only on the validation data). Here, RASE is reported rather than RMSE. Compare RASE and AAE (average absolute error) values for these four models. Which model has the lowest “error”? b. Conduct a sintilar experiment to assess the effect of changing the number oflayers in the network as well as the activation functions.

Read More »

Sales Offer

Coupon Code: SAVE25 to claim 25% special special discount