Olofsson was a delivery driver for the Mission Linen company. In 2004, he went to Sweden for about five weeks (nonvaction time) to visit his parents. The plant manager, Jack Anderson Sr., had said Olofsson could go if he filled out the proper slip. Olofsson filled out the slip and went through the proper company procedures with the payroll clerk Ruth Clark. Once the paper was filled out with Clark’s help, the paper then must be authorized by the company. After Olofsson returned from his trip, his elderly mother informed him that she would be undergoing extensive back surgery and asked him to come take care of her during the recovery process. Olofsson said that Anderson (an area manager) said he could go if he filled out another form and turned in a doctor’s note. However, Clark told him that Anderson was not authorized to grant him medical leave and they had to wait for a response from HR. She also said that the doctor’s note had no letterhead and did not look as if it had come from a legitimate medical establishment. Clark then gave Olofsson a government form that the doctor filled out and faxed back. Oloffson went to Sweden, and after he was there he was informed by executives that he did not work enough hours that year to qualify for medical leave and thus he was terminated. Olofsson sued for wrongful termination in that even though he didn’t work enough hours that year and his papers had never been authorized by executives, he was led to believe that he could take the medical leave. How do you think the court decided?

Share this :
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on whatsapp
Share on pinterest

Found something interesting ?

• On-time delivery guarantee
• PhD-level professional writers
• Free Plagiarism Report

• 100% money-back guarantee
• Absolute Privacy & Confidentiality
• High Quality custom-written papers

Related Model Questions

Feel free to peruse our college and university model questions. If any our our assignment tasks interests you, click to place your order. Every paper is written by our professional essay writers from scratch to avoid plagiarism. We guarantee highest quality of work besides delivering your paper on time.

Being able to manage across different cultures is a key skill for working in a globalised economy, but is our knowledge about cross-cultural management adequate and relevant? The bulk of the knowledge we have on cross-cultural management comes from American academics, writing for an American audience. Mainstream cross-cultural management research—illustrated by the landmark work of Hofstede (1980)—is routinely criticised for two reasons: 1) it is built and developed from an almost exclusive and exclusionary North-American standpoint; and 2) it is underpinned by a paradigm that embeds a simplistic conception of culture. Critics believe that cross-cultural management, rather than serving the noble task of genuinely enhancing and enabling a better understanding across cultures, serves instead as a tool to reinforce the hegemony of the North-American way of doing business. In recent years, different perspectives have been used to challenge this state. With businesses having increasingly to deal with the ‘shock’ of cultures, whether our knowledge is adequate or not is an important question to explore. A literature review on this topic will pay attention to the most recent developments in cross-cultural management. This could include postcolonial analyses of cross-cultural management, which question the implicit imposition of a Western norm as normality (Kwek, 2003) and the power imbalances reproduced by management theories (e.g. Westwood, 2006). It could also include less obvious perspectives, such as Feminist analyses of cross-cultural management, which challenge the marginalization of women’s experience (e.g. Calás, 1992) from theories of cross-cultural management.

Read More »

Special Offer

Use the Coupon Code: SAVE25 to save 25% on your next order.